Skip to main content
Get your workspace’s own ICP judgment on a lead: a 0–100 fit + tier, a decaying intent score, and the layered breakdown — Fit · Pain · Intent · Ability — where any layer you have no evidence for comes back unknown, never 0, with a missing worklist telling you what to enrich next. Three ways to call it:
  • A lead in Nous — pass an identifier. Scored off its claims and staked; keeps evolving.
  • One cold lead not in Nous — pass attributes. Scored inline; nothing is written.
  • A whole external list — pass leads (up to 1000). Scored inline in one call; nothing written.

Parameters

Returns

A known or cold lead — the fit, intent, and the layered read with its worklist:
A cold lead scored inline is the same, tagged scored inline (not in the graph). An external list returns a summary — how many scored and the tier spread — while the raw per-lead results (each with its ref, icp, and layered) come back over the API:

The layered model

The score is four independent layers, each resolved on its own evidence — Fit (who they are), Pain (do they have the problem), Intent (is it the right time), Ability (can they buy). A LinkedIn headline resolves Fit and leaves the rest unknown (never 0); missing is the worklist, and play is the recommended action (research · nurture · work now · enrich · suppress). As enrichment lands the layers light up. Tune the model on the ICP page or with build_icp_model.

When to call it

  • Triage a cold list before enrichment — leads, nothing written.
  • Score one prospect from a LinkedIn scrape — attributes.
  • Get the live number on an account in Nous — identifier.
  • Only a bare identifier that isn’t in the graph and has no attributes comes back unknown_identifier.
For the full request/response shape, see the REST reference.